TY - JOUR
T1 - Early Experience of Left Bundle Branch Pacing with Lumenless Lead in a Single Center
T2 - A Case Series
AU - Gunawan, Evan Jim
AU - Johan, Johan
AU - Munawar, Dian Andina
AU - Munawar, Dian Larasati
AU - Hartono, Beny
AU - Munawar, Muhammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4/1
Y1 - 2024/4/1
N2 - Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been subject to increasing interest over the last few years due to its capacity for physiological conduction and its advantages compared to His bundle pacing. His bundle pacing has certain limitations, such as a small pacing area for the His bundle, a high threshold that leads to battery depletion, a low R-wave amplitude that may result in atrial or His oversensing, and ventricular signal undersensing. In this case series, four patients (two female and two male) aged 62.2 ± 8.4 years old with symptomatic sick sinus disease and no scar tissue in the interventricular septum underwent LBBP. All LBBPs were done with standard LBBP using a lumenless SelectSecure 3830 lead (Medtronic®, Minneapolis, USA) with a fixed helix. The lead parameters showed a good R-wave amplitudes (13 ± 7.4 mV) and a low threshold (0.77 ± 0.17 V @ 0.4 ms). All patients were discharged on the next day. During follow-up period of 13.3 ± 12.9 months, all patients were well and no complications were noted. In conclusion, LBBP may be as an alternative of novel conduction pacing techniques and can be done relatively easy and safe, even with limited experience center.
AB - Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been subject to increasing interest over the last few years due to its capacity for physiological conduction and its advantages compared to His bundle pacing. His bundle pacing has certain limitations, such as a small pacing area for the His bundle, a high threshold that leads to battery depletion, a low R-wave amplitude that may result in atrial or His oversensing, and ventricular signal undersensing. In this case series, four patients (two female and two male) aged 62.2 ± 8.4 years old with symptomatic sick sinus disease and no scar tissue in the interventricular septum underwent LBBP. All LBBPs were done with standard LBBP using a lumenless SelectSecure 3830 lead (Medtronic®, Minneapolis, USA) with a fixed helix. The lead parameters showed a good R-wave amplitudes (13 ± 7.4 mV) and a low threshold (0.77 ± 0.17 V @ 0.4 ms). All patients were discharged on the next day. During follow-up period of 13.3 ± 12.9 months, all patients were well and no complications were noted. In conclusion, LBBP may be as an alternative of novel conduction pacing techniques and can be done relatively easy and safe, even with limited experience center.
KW - Left bundle pacing
KW - pacemaker
KW - sick sinus syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198923941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 39010770
AN - SCOPUS:85198923941
SN - 0125-9326
VL - 56
SP - 227
EP - 232
JO - Acta medica Indonesiana
JF - Acta medica Indonesiana
IS - 2
ER -