Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial

Shao Liang Chen, Jue Jie Zhang, Yaling Han, Jing Kan, Lianglong Chen, Chunguang Qiu, Tiemin Jiang, Ling Tao, Hesong Zeng, Li Li, Yong Xia, Chuanyu Gao, Teguh Santoso Sukamto, Chootopol Paiboon, Yan Wang, Tak W. Kwan, Fei Ye, Nailiang Tian, Zhizhong Liu, Song LinChengzhi Lu, Shangyu Wen, Lang Hong, Qi Zhang, Imad Sheiban, Yawei Xu, Lefeng Wang, Tanveer S. Rab, Zhanquan Li, Guanchang Cheng, Lianqun Cui, Martin B. Leon, Gregg W. Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Provisional stenting (PS) is the most common technique used to treat distal left main (LM) bifurcation lesions in patients with unprotected LM coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The double kissing (DK) crush planned 2-stent technique has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in non-LM bifurcations compared with PS, and in LM bifurcations compared with culotte stenting, but has never been compared with PS in LM bifurcation lesions. Objectives The authors sought to determine whether a planned DK crush 2-stent technique is superior to PS for patients with true distal LM bifurcation lesions. Methods The authors randomized 482 patients from 26 centers in 5 countries with true distal LM bifurcation lesions (Medina 1,1,1 or 0,1,1) to PS (n = 242) or DK crush stenting (n = 240). The primary endpoint was the 1-year composite rate of target lesion failure (TLF): cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Routine 13-month angiographic follow-up was scheduled after ascertainment of the primary endpoint. Results TLF within 1 year occurred in 26 patients (10.7%) assigned to PS, and in 12 patients (5.0%) assigned to DK crush (hazard ratio: 0.42; 95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 0.85; p = 0.02). Compared with PS, DK crush also resulted in lower rates of target vessel myocardial infarction I (2.9% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.03) and definite or probable stent thrombosis (3.3% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.02). Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (7.9% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.06) and angiographic restenosis within the LM complex (14.6% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.10) also tended to be less frequent with DK crush compared with PS. There was no significant difference in cardiac death between the groups. Conclusions In the present multicenter randomized trial, percutaneous coronary intervention of true distal LM bifurcation lesions using a planned DK crush 2-stent strategy resulted in a lower rate of TLF at 1 year than a PS strategy. (Double Kissing and Double Crush Versus Provisional T Stenting Technique for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main True Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized, International, Multi-Center Clinical Trial [DKCRUSH-V]; ChiCTR-TRC-11001213)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2605-2617
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume70
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • double kissing crush
  • left main bifurcation lesions
  • prognosis
  • provisional stenting

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this