TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Trastuzumab Offer Good Value for Money for Breast Cancer Patients with Metastasis in Indonesia?
AU - Kristin, Erna
AU - Endarti, Dwi
AU - Khoe, Levina Chandra
AU - Pratiwi, Woro Rukmi
AU - Pinzon, Rizaldy Taslim
AU - Febrinasari, Ratih Puspita
AU - Yasmina, Alfi
AU - Nugrahaningsih, Dwi Aris Agung
AU - Taroeno-Hariadi, Kartika Widayati
AU - Karsono, Ramadhan
AU - Sudarsa, I. Wayan
AU - Prenggono, Muhammad Darwin
AU - Herlinawaty, Eva
AU - Komaryani, Kalsum
AU - Hidayat, Budi
AU - Nadjib, Mardiati
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Health Insurance Agency (BPJS Kesehatan) as part of the Health Technology Assessment study under the Center of Financing and Health Insurance (PPJK), Ministry of Health, Government of Indonesia.
Publisher Copyright:
© This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Indonesia, with Indonesia’s breast cancer mortality rate being the highest among Southeast Asian countries. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impacts of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in Indonesia. Methods: We performed a Markov model-based economic evaluation to assess cost-effectiveness, cost–utility, and budget impact. Utility data, direct medical costs, and indirect costs were obtained primarily from interviewing patients. Clinical effectiveness data, on the other hand, were obtained from systematic reviews and real-world data and represented through progression free survival, overall survival, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Result: From a healthcare provider’s perspective, the total costs for the combined group were USD 14,516, while chemotherapy alone cost USD 7,489. While the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the combination group had a higher total cost by USD 7,027, PFS was longer in the chemotherapy alone group, with a difference of 2.2 months. The ICER was USD 17,307 for every QALY gained. The total cost of adding trastuzumab over a 5-year period was USD 589 million.
AB - Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Indonesia, with Indonesia’s breast cancer mortality rate being the highest among Southeast Asian countries. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impacts of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in Indonesia. Methods: We performed a Markov model-based economic evaluation to assess cost-effectiveness, cost–utility, and budget impact. Utility data, direct medical costs, and indirect costs were obtained primarily from interviewing patients. Clinical effectiveness data, on the other hand, were obtained from systematic reviews and real-world data and represented through progression free survival, overall survival, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Result: From a healthcare provider’s perspective, the total costs for the combined group were USD 14,516, while chemotherapy alone cost USD 7,489. While the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the combination group had a higher total cost by USD 7,027, PFS was longer in the chemotherapy alone group, with a difference of 2.2 months. The ICER was USD 17,307 for every QALY gained. The total cost of adding trastuzumab over a 5-year period was USD 589 million.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Economic evaluation
KW - Her2-positive
KW - Trastuzumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135421721&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.7.2441
DO - 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.7.2441
M3 - Article
C2 - 35901352
AN - SCOPUS:85135421721
SN - 1513-7368
VL - 23
SP - 2441
EP - 2447
JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
IS - 7
ER -