Differences of Patient Safety Goal's Implementation Between Five Accredited Hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia

Introduction: The implementation of patient safety has been carried out in hospitals in Indonesia, but nurses are still dissatisfied with the outcome of the implementation of patient safety. This study was to identify the differences of patient safety goals' implementation between five accredited hospitals in Indonesia. Methods: The study used Cross Sectional design by distributing to 549 nurses from five hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. Nurses participated in this study through proportionate random sampling. The patient safety implementation questionnaire was developed by the research team based on six indicators by hospital accreditation committee in Indonesia. Data was analyzed descriptive, Analysis of Variant (ANOVA. Results: There were a difference patient safety implementation between hospitals. Overall patient safety implementation was rated as very good to excellent 88.2-91.6%. Significant differences in patient safety implementation are patient identification (p= <0.001), right location, patient, procedure of surgery (p= <0.001), reducing the risk of infection (p= 0.001), and reducing the risk patient fall (p= 0.002). Nurses' perception on accreditatiton system affecting patient safety implementatiton (F=63.3, p=<0.001). Conclusion: An excellent accredited hospital have a good implementation of patient safety goals even though they have not reached optimal values. Hospitals that are fully accredited must always improve patient safety continuously. The result of this study indicate that positive nurses' perception of accreditation will improve patient safety implementation in hospital.