TY - JOUR
T1 - Difference in the extent of debris extrusion between instrumentation with ProTaper® and ProTaper Next®
T2 - 2nd Physics and Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry Symposium, PTMDS 2018
AU - Aprilia, R.
AU - Usman, M.
AU - Nursasongko, B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2018/9/7
Y1 - 2018/9/7
N2 - During chemomechanical preparation, debris extrusion could trigger an inflammatory response and delay periapical healing. Reportedly, while instrumentation with ProTaper® causes significant debris extrusion, no data are available for instrumentation with ProTaper Next®. This study aimed to determine and compare amounts of debris extruded in the instrumentation with ProTaper® and ProTaper Next®. In total, 60 premolars were evenly distributed into two groups as follows: ProTaper® group and ProTaper Next® group. Then, debris extruded during instrumentation was collected in a bottle and the difference between the weight of the bottle before and after instrumentation was considered as the amount of debris extruded. The amount of debris extruded with instrumentation with ProTaper® was significantly higher than that with ProTaper Next® (t-test, p < 0.005). Our experimental study demonstrates that the extent of debris extrusion with ProTaper Next® was less than that with ProTaper®.
AB - During chemomechanical preparation, debris extrusion could trigger an inflammatory response and delay periapical healing. Reportedly, while instrumentation with ProTaper® causes significant debris extrusion, no data are available for instrumentation with ProTaper Next®. This study aimed to determine and compare amounts of debris extruded in the instrumentation with ProTaper® and ProTaper Next®. In total, 60 premolars were evenly distributed into two groups as follows: ProTaper® group and ProTaper Next® group. Then, debris extruded during instrumentation was collected in a bottle and the difference between the weight of the bottle before and after instrumentation was considered as the amount of debris extruded. The amount of debris extruded with instrumentation with ProTaper® was significantly higher than that with ProTaper Next® (t-test, p < 0.005). Our experimental study demonstrates that the extent of debris extrusion with ProTaper Next® was less than that with ProTaper®.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054543203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/6/062007
DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/6/062007
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85054543203
SN - 1742-6588
VL - 1073
JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series
IS - 6
M1 - 062007
Y2 - 18 July 2018 through 18 July 2018
ER -