TY - GEN
T1 - Development of resilience factors and indicators in an urban public transportation provider to evaluate passenger station resiliency
AU - Rosidin, Rizkika R.
AU - Rahardjo, Ernie W.
AU - Hidayatno, Akhmad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 AIP Publishing LLC.
PY - 2024/2/6
Y1 - 2024/2/6
N2 - Recent major disruptions have changed the way we look at the importance of business and operational resiliency. For example, operational Resiliency in City Transportation Services is critical to make sure that the mobility of people is not disrupted too long after a major disruption. Instead, it must bounce back quickly to the normal level or the desired condition. However, there is not much literature on defining and translating the concept of resiliency to evaluate institutional preparedness. Therefore, this paper aims to explore how to translate a concept of resiliency with four aspects of resilience (robustness, resourcefulness, redundancy, and rapidity) into a set of indicators groups found in organizational functions. We use literature studies and focus group discussions with experts on defining the indicators and using a Mass Rapid Transit Operations case study. We then prioritize this indicators group as a guide for each passenger station improvement using the AHP method (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS method (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) to achieve the passenger station rank on their resiliency performance.
AB - Recent major disruptions have changed the way we look at the importance of business and operational resiliency. For example, operational Resiliency in City Transportation Services is critical to make sure that the mobility of people is not disrupted too long after a major disruption. Instead, it must bounce back quickly to the normal level or the desired condition. However, there is not much literature on defining and translating the concept of resiliency to evaluate institutional preparedness. Therefore, this paper aims to explore how to translate a concept of resiliency with four aspects of resilience (robustness, resourcefulness, redundancy, and rapidity) into a set of indicators groups found in organizational functions. We use literature studies and focus group discussions with experts on defining the indicators and using a Mass Rapid Transit Operations case study. We then prioritize this indicators group as a guide for each passenger station improvement using the AHP method (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS method (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) to achieve the passenger station rank on their resiliency performance.
KW - Analytical Hierarchy Process
KW - Multi-Criteria Decision Making
KW - Resiliency Indicators
KW - Urban Transportation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185771511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0157755
DO - 10.1063/5.0157755
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85185771511
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - AIP Conference Proceedings
A2 - Kusuma, Andyka
A2 - Fatriansyah, Jaka Fajar
A2 - Dhelika, Radon
A2 - Pratama, Mochamad Adhiraga
A2 - Irwansyah, Ridho
A2 - Maknun, Imam Jauhari
A2 - Putra, Wahyuaji Narottama
A2 - Ardi, Romadhani
A2 - Harwahyu, Ruki
A2 - Harahap, Yulia Nurliani
A2 - Lischer, Kenny
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 17th International Conference on Quality in Research, QiR 2021 in conjunction with the International Tropical Renewable Energy Conference 2021, I-Trec 2021 and the 2nd AUN-SCUD International Conference, CAIC-SIUD
Y2 - 13 October 2021 through 15 October 2021
ER -