TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of suboptimal IMRT treatment plan using machine learning on radiomics features of dose distribution for lung cancers
AU - Valerian, Joel
AU - Sihono, Dwi Seno Kuncoro
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dwi Seno Kuncoro Sihono reports financial support was provided by University of Indonesia Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences.The authors would like to thank Siloam MRCCC Semanggi Hospital for allowing the use of patients' data and the Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia for providing the necessary tools to finish this research. This study was supported by FMIPA Universitas Indonesia Research Grant with contract number 006/UN2.F3.D/PPM.00.02/2022.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Siloam MRCCC Semanggi Hospital for allowing the use of patients' data and the Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia for providing the necessary tools to finish this research. This study was supported by FMIPA Universitas Indonesia Research Grant with contract number 006/UN2.F3.D/PPM.00.02/2022 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Quality assurance in radiotherapy is an important process so that the use of radiation provides maximum benefits. Currently, the implementation of machine learning (ML) in the quality assurance of treatment planning is growing. In this study, 34 optimal intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans and 10 suboptimal IMRT treatment plans obtained from Siloam MRCCC Semanggi Hospital were used to train an ML model of the type autoencoder for anomaly detection developed using PyTorch. There were four stages in this study, namely the preparation stage, development stage, validation stage, and evaluation stage. At the development stage, the raw data was prepared so that it is ready to be used for training. At the development stage, the model was developed and a hyperparameters optimization was performed. The accuracy of the model was analyzed at the validation stage. Finally, at the evaluation stage, the model performance was evaluated along with a Mann-Whitney U test on dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, radiomics features, and DVH metrics (conformity index and homogeneity index) to show the difference between treatment plans. The model used 161 radiomics features with an epoch of 1250 iterations, 150-50-17 hidden layers configuration, and a learning rate of 0.2 as the most optimal configuration. The results showed an accuracy of 36% with 7% of radiomics features, 50% of DVH parameters, and the homogeneity index being different significantly. After refinement, that is removing data with conformity index below one, the accuracy became 50% with 12% of radiomics features, 45% of DVH parameters, and both DVH metrics being different significantly. If the radiomics features used are those that were significantly different, the accuracy increased to 93%. From these results, it can be concluded that most radiomics features are noise that need to be removed so the model can detect suboptimal treatment plans. In addition, the planning target volume segment along with the firstorder radiomics features group is the main differentiator between the optimal and suboptimal treatment plans.
AB - Quality assurance in radiotherapy is an important process so that the use of radiation provides maximum benefits. Currently, the implementation of machine learning (ML) in the quality assurance of treatment planning is growing. In this study, 34 optimal intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans and 10 suboptimal IMRT treatment plans obtained from Siloam MRCCC Semanggi Hospital were used to train an ML model of the type autoencoder for anomaly detection developed using PyTorch. There were four stages in this study, namely the preparation stage, development stage, validation stage, and evaluation stage. At the development stage, the raw data was prepared so that it is ready to be used for training. At the development stage, the model was developed and a hyperparameters optimization was performed. The accuracy of the model was analyzed at the validation stage. Finally, at the evaluation stage, the model performance was evaluated along with a Mann-Whitney U test on dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, radiomics features, and DVH metrics (conformity index and homogeneity index) to show the difference between treatment plans. The model used 161 radiomics features with an epoch of 1250 iterations, 150-50-17 hidden layers configuration, and a learning rate of 0.2 as the most optimal configuration. The results showed an accuracy of 36% with 7% of radiomics features, 50% of DVH parameters, and the homogeneity index being different significantly. After refinement, that is removing data with conformity index below one, the accuracy became 50% with 12% of radiomics features, 45% of DVH parameters, and both DVH metrics being different significantly. If the radiomics features used are those that were significantly different, the accuracy increased to 93%. From these results, it can be concluded that most radiomics features are noise that need to be removed so the model can detect suboptimal treatment plans. In addition, the planning target volume segment along with the firstorder radiomics features group is the main differentiator between the optimal and suboptimal treatment plans.
KW - IMRT
KW - Machine learning
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Radiomics
KW - Treatment planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163865330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111130
DO - 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111130
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85163865330
SN - 0969-806X
VL - 212
JO - Radiation Physics and Chemistry
JF - Radiation Physics and Chemistry
M1 - 111130
ER -