D-dimer levels on admission and all-cause mortality risk in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis

Daniel Martin Simadibrata, Anna Mira Lubis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

D-dimer level on admission is a promising biomarker to predict mortality in patients with COVID-19. In this study, we reviewed the association between on-admission D-dimer levels and all-cause mortality risk in COVID-19 patients. Peer-reviewed studies and preprints reporting categorised D-dimer levels on admission and all-cause mortality until 24 May 2020 were searched for using the following keywords: 'COVID-19', 'D-dimer' and 'Mortality'. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled risk ratio (RR) for all-cause mortality. In total, 2911 COVID-19 patients from nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. Regardless of the different D-dimer cut-off values used, the pooled RR for all-cause mortality in patients with elevated vs. normal on-admission D-dimer level was 4.77 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.02-7.54). Sensitivity analysis did not significantly affect the overall mortality risk. Analysis restricted to studies with 0.5 μg/ml as the cut-off value resulted in a pooled RR for mortality of 4.60 (95% CI 2.72-7.79). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled all-cause mortality risk was higher in Chinese vs. non-Chinese studies (RR 5.87; 95% CI 2.67-12.89 and RR 3.35; 95% CI 1.66-6.73; P = 0.29). On-admission D-dimer levels showed a promising prognostic role in predicting all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients, elevated D-dimer levels were associated with increased risk of mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e202
JournalEpidemiology and Infection
Volume148
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • Coronavirus disease
  • COVID-19
  • D-dimer
  • mortality
  • prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'D-dimer levels on admission and all-cause mortality risk in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this