TY - JOUR
T1 - Cytogenetic comparison of bioceramic, silicone, and methacrylate resin sealers on t lymphocytes (Micronuclei analysis)
AU - Sugiana, Dewi Isroyati
AU - Nazar, Kamizar
AU - Meidyawati, Ratna
AU - Tulim, Sunny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Objective: Biocompatibility refers to the manner in which materials respond to living cells and includes cytotoxicity, cytogenicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. To determine cytogenicity, we count the micronuclei that form after applying materials to living cells. Sealer is a chemical material that can be directly contacted in periapical tissue and is potentially cytogenetic. Bioceramic, silicon, and methacrylate resin sealers have ingredients that are potentially cytogenetic. We examined the interactions of these sealers with lymphocyte T-cells. Methods: We counted the number of micronuclei following treatment with bioceramic, silicone, and methacrylate resin sealers on lymphocyte T-cells at 1, 3, and 7 days. Results: The micronuclei scores associated with bioceramic and silicone sealers were lower than methacrylate resin (p<0.05) between days 1, 3, and 7. The micronuclei scores of bioceramic and silicone sealers on day 1 were higher than on days 3 and 7. There were no significant between-group differences for bioceramic and silicone sealers on days 3 and 7. The highest micronuclei score for methacrylate resin was on day 1. Conclusion: Bioceramic and silicone sealers were less cytogenetic than methacrylate resin sealer. However, all of the sealers produce micronuclei on days 1, 3, and 7.
AB - Objective: Biocompatibility refers to the manner in which materials respond to living cells and includes cytotoxicity, cytogenicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. To determine cytogenicity, we count the micronuclei that form after applying materials to living cells. Sealer is a chemical material that can be directly contacted in periapical tissue and is potentially cytogenetic. Bioceramic, silicon, and methacrylate resin sealers have ingredients that are potentially cytogenetic. We examined the interactions of these sealers with lymphocyte T-cells. Methods: We counted the number of micronuclei following treatment with bioceramic, silicone, and methacrylate resin sealers on lymphocyte T-cells at 1, 3, and 7 days. Results: The micronuclei scores associated with bioceramic and silicone sealers were lower than methacrylate resin (p<0.05) between days 1, 3, and 7. The micronuclei scores of bioceramic and silicone sealers on day 1 were higher than on days 3 and 7. There were no significant between-group differences for bioceramic and silicone sealers on days 3 and 7. The highest micronuclei score for methacrylate resin was on day 1. Conclusion: Bioceramic and silicone sealers were less cytogenetic than methacrylate resin sealer. However, all of the sealers produce micronuclei on days 1, 3, and 7.
KW - Bioceramic
KW - Cytogenetic
KW - Methacrylate resin
KW - Micronuclei
KW - Silicone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068015426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22159/ijap.2019.v11s1.16014
DO - 10.22159/ijap.2019.v11s1.16014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068015426
SN - 0975-7058
VL - 11
SP - 146
EP - 149
JO - International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics
JF - International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics
ER -