TY - JOUR
T1 - Cultural Values Moderate the Impact of Relative Deprivation
AU - Smith, Heather J.
AU - Ryan, Desiree A.
AU - Jaurique, Alexandria
AU - Pettigrew, Thomas F.
AU - Jetten, Jolanda
AU - Amarina, null
AU - Autin, Frédérique
AU - Ayub, Nadia
AU - Badea, Constantina
AU - Besta, Tomasz
AU - Butera, Fabrizio
AU - Costa-Lopes, Rui
AU - Cui, Lijuan
AU - Fantini, Carole
AU - Finchilescu, Gillian
AU - Gaertner, Lowell
AU - Gollwitzer, Mario
AU - Gómez, Ángel
AU - González, Roberto
AU - Hong, Ying Yi
AU - Høj Jensen, Dorthe
AU - Karasawa, Minoru
AU - Kessler, Thomas
AU - Klein, Olivier
AU - Lima, Marcus
AU - Renvik, Tuuli Anna
AU - Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga
AU - Megevand, Laura
AU - Morton, Thomas
AU - Paladino, Paola
AU - Polya, Tibor
AU - Ruza, Aleksejs
AU - Shahrazad, Wan
AU - Sharma, Sushama
AU - Teymoori, Ali
AU - Torres, Ana Raquel
AU - van der Bles, Anne Marthe
AU - Wohl, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Relative deprivation (RD) is the judgment that one or one’s ingroup is worse off compared with some relevant standard coupled with feelings of dissatisfaction, anger, and resentment. RD predicts a wide range of outcomes, but it is unclear whether this relationship is moderated by national cultural differences. Therefore, in the first study, we used national assessments of individual-collectivism and power distance to code 303 effect sizes from 31 different countries with 200,578 participants. RD predicted outcomes ranging from life satisfaction to collective action more strongly within individualistic nations. A second survey of 6,112 undergraduate university students from 28 different countries confirmed the predictive value of RD. Again, the relationship between individual RD and different outcomes was stronger for students who lived in more individualistic countries. Group-based RD also predicted political trust more strongly for students who lived in countries marked by lower power distance. RD effects, although consistent predictors, are culturally bounded. In particular, RD is more likely to motivate reactions within individualistic countries that emphasize individual agency and achievement as a source of self-worth.
AB - Relative deprivation (RD) is the judgment that one or one’s ingroup is worse off compared with some relevant standard coupled with feelings of dissatisfaction, anger, and resentment. RD predicts a wide range of outcomes, but it is unclear whether this relationship is moderated by national cultural differences. Therefore, in the first study, we used national assessments of individual-collectivism and power distance to code 303 effect sizes from 31 different countries with 200,578 participants. RD predicted outcomes ranging from life satisfaction to collective action more strongly within individualistic nations. A second survey of 6,112 undergraduate university students from 28 different countries confirmed the predictive value of RD. Again, the relationship between individual RD and different outcomes was stronger for students who lived in more individualistic countries. Group-based RD also predicted political trust more strongly for students who lived in countries marked by lower power distance. RD effects, although consistent predictors, are culturally bounded. In particular, RD is more likely to motivate reactions within individualistic countries that emphasize individual agency and achievement as a source of self-worth.
KW - Hofstede’s national values
KW - life satisfaction
KW - political trust
KW - relative deprivation
KW - social inequality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049826733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022022118784213
DO - 10.1177/0022022118784213
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049826733
SN - 0022-0221
VL - 49
SP - 1183
EP - 1218
JO - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
JF - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
IS - 8
ER -