Correction to: Anopheles sundaicus complex and the presence of anopheles epiroticus in Indonesia (PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases)

Din Syafruddin, Yulia E. Lestari, Dendi H. Permana, Puji B.S. Asih, Brandyce St. Laurent, Siti Zubaidah, Ismail E. Rozi, Sully Kosasih, Shinta, Supratman Sukowati, Lukman Hakim, Edhi Haryanto, Wibowo Mangunwardoyo, Michael J. Bangs, Neil F. Lobo

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In the ITS2 fragment sequence analysis subsection of the Results, there is an error in the fifth sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: For example, a sample from western Sumba (SM1-108) possessed a G>T transversion at nt 538 but lacked a base transition at nt 479 (Fig 2). The images for Figs 3 and 4 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 4, and the image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 3. The figure captions appear in the correct order. Please view the images in the correct order here.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0009345
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Anopheles sundaicus complex and the presence of anopheles epiroticus in Indonesia (PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this