Comparison of volumetric shrinkage of composite resin nanoceramic and nanofiller

Bani Imran Masulili, Endang Suprastiwi, Dewa Ayu Nyoman Putri Artiningsih, Caterin Novista

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The main cause of failure of composite resin restorations is volumetric shrinkage. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare volumetric shrinkage in nanohybrid and nanoceramic composite resins. Methods: A total of 32 (3 cm×3 cm× 2 mm) cavities were analyzed for volume using micro-CT. The samples were divided randomly into two groups: 16 cavities that were restored using nanohybrid composite resin and 16 cavities that were restored using nanoceramic composite resin. The composite resin volume was analyzed using micro-CT. Results: The difference in volumetric shrinkage between nanohybrid composite resin 245,866.5 mm3 (3%) and nanoceramic composite resin 3,470,175.13 mm3 (5%) was not significant (p=0.585). Conclusion: Nanohybrid and nanoceramic composite resins have the same volumetric shrinkage rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics
Volume12
Issue numberSpecial Issue 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Composite resin
  • Nanoceramic
  • Nanohybrid
  • Volumetric shrinkage

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of volumetric shrinkage of composite resin nanoceramic and nanofiller'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this