TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of functional outcome between bone quadriceps tendon (BQT) and single-bundle hamstring tendon (SBHT) autograft in arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction cases
T2 - a prospective cohort study
AU - Lubis, Andri MT
AU - Dasril, Demy Faheem
N1 - Funding Information:
There is no conflict of interest regarding this study, since this is the first study ever conducted regarding quadriceps tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction cases in our country. The authors and all the team for data gathering and calculations are not sponsored by pharmaceutical or implant company whatsoever. Funding and research packaging were carried out by authors own monetary budget.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Background: ACL rupture has a high morbidity in productive-age population. The increasing incidence and proper management has become a point of interest in the musculoskeletal sport injury. Choosing the best graft has become the main focus in searching for a better outcome regarding ACL reconstruction in these patient population. Currently, single bundle hamstring tendon (SBHT) autograft was preferred in Asian population compared to bone quadriceps tendon (BQT) autograft. However, there are some problems such as short and small in diameter of SBHT. This study is focused on evaluation of the clinical outcome between BQT and SBHT in arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction patients. Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study, 30 subjects were divided into 2 groups (BQT and SBHT). Sampling was taken between February 2017–2018 (1 year) in one orthopaedic center. The instruments used for evaluation are rolimeter and patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires (IKDC, Tegner-Lysholm, and KOOS) with data mining between 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post operation. This study has been reported in line with the STROCSS criteria. Results: Mean difference of quadriceps (3.12 ± 0.94) and hamstring (3.87 ± 0.61) in rolimeter measurement 1 year post operation is statistically significant (p = 0.015). Side-to-side difference shows better result in quadriceps (0.34 ± 0.70) compared to hamstring (0.84 ± 0.60) with p value 0.04. IKDC scores in one month (p = 0.002; CI95% [8.81–31.79]) and three months (p = 0.004; CI95% [4.85–20.39]) post operative is better in quadriceps group. Tegner-Lysholm assessment 1 month post operative showed consistent results between numeric (p = 0.004) and categoric data (p = 0.050) in quadriceps group. There was an improvement during six months and one year post operative KOOS sub-item scales; pain (p = 0.034) and symptoms (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Functional outcome of patient undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction is better in BQT group compared to SBHT group, both in subjective and objective parameters given.
AB - Background: ACL rupture has a high morbidity in productive-age population. The increasing incidence and proper management has become a point of interest in the musculoskeletal sport injury. Choosing the best graft has become the main focus in searching for a better outcome regarding ACL reconstruction in these patient population. Currently, single bundle hamstring tendon (SBHT) autograft was preferred in Asian population compared to bone quadriceps tendon (BQT) autograft. However, there are some problems such as short and small in diameter of SBHT. This study is focused on evaluation of the clinical outcome between BQT and SBHT in arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction patients. Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study, 30 subjects were divided into 2 groups (BQT and SBHT). Sampling was taken between February 2017–2018 (1 year) in one orthopaedic center. The instruments used for evaluation are rolimeter and patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires (IKDC, Tegner-Lysholm, and KOOS) with data mining between 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post operation. This study has been reported in line with the STROCSS criteria. Results: Mean difference of quadriceps (3.12 ± 0.94) and hamstring (3.87 ± 0.61) in rolimeter measurement 1 year post operation is statistically significant (p = 0.015). Side-to-side difference shows better result in quadriceps (0.34 ± 0.70) compared to hamstring (0.84 ± 0.60) with p value 0.04. IKDC scores in one month (p = 0.002; CI95% [8.81–31.79]) and three months (p = 0.004; CI95% [4.85–20.39]) post operative is better in quadriceps group. Tegner-Lysholm assessment 1 month post operative showed consistent results between numeric (p = 0.004) and categoric data (p = 0.050) in quadriceps group. There was an improvement during six months and one year post operative KOOS sub-item scales; pain (p = 0.034) and symptoms (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Functional outcome of patient undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction is better in BQT group compared to SBHT group, both in subjective and objective parameters given.
KW - ACL reconstruction
KW - Arthroscopic-assisted
KW - BQT and SBHT graft
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096645938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.023
DO - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85096645938
SN - 2049-0801
VL - 60
SP - 509
EP - 514
JO - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
JF - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
ER -