TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between PRP and PRFM on FTSG healing profile
T2 - Macroscopic, microscopic and ELISA evaluation
AU - Reksodiputro, Mirta Hediyati
AU - Harahap, Alida Roswita
AU - Siregar, Nurjati Chairani
AU - Malik, Safarina Golfiani
AU - Bashirudin, Jenny
AU - Boesoirie, Muhammad Thaufiq Siddiq
AU - Widodo, Dini Widiarni
AU - Iljanto, Sandi
AU - Sajuthi, Dondin
AU - Sukrisman, Lugyanti
AU - Yosia, Mikhael
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank colleagues and faculty for their support in conducting this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Studies had shown the benefit of PRFM and PRP in wound healing but their use in skin graft healing was rarely studied. This study aims to compare the use of PRP and PRFM in accelerating wound healing process of skin full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). Materials and methods: Five pigs were used to look at the wound healing effect of PRP and PRFM usage prior to FTSG implantation. Subsequent punch biopsies were then conducted on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 30th day to obtain samples for macroscopic (skin color), extracellular matrix (collagen), microscopic (PMN, macrophage, and fibroblast), and ELISA (TGFβ1 and PDGF) analysis to determine the level of wound healing activity. ImageJ software was used to photograph for macroscopic and extracellular matrix analysis. Results: Macroscopic, extracellular matrix, and ELISA evaluation show no significant difference in FTSG survival rates for all treatment groups. Microscopic examination showed an increase in PMN, macrophage, and fibroblast levels with PRFM application showing higher increases in all observed microscopic variables compared to PRP and control. Conclusion: This study observed that both PRFM and PRP as autologous platelet preparation accelerate wound healing in FTSG, with PRFM being superior due to the higher number of PMN, macrophage, and fibroblast.
AB - Background: Studies had shown the benefit of PRFM and PRP in wound healing but their use in skin graft healing was rarely studied. This study aims to compare the use of PRP and PRFM in accelerating wound healing process of skin full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). Materials and methods: Five pigs were used to look at the wound healing effect of PRP and PRFM usage prior to FTSG implantation. Subsequent punch biopsies were then conducted on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 30th day to obtain samples for macroscopic (skin color), extracellular matrix (collagen), microscopic (PMN, macrophage, and fibroblast), and ELISA (TGFβ1 and PDGF) analysis to determine the level of wound healing activity. ImageJ software was used to photograph for macroscopic and extracellular matrix analysis. Results: Macroscopic, extracellular matrix, and ELISA evaluation show no significant difference in FTSG survival rates for all treatment groups. Microscopic examination showed an increase in PMN, macrophage, and fibroblast levels with PRFM application showing higher increases in all observed microscopic variables compared to PRP and control. Conclusion: This study observed that both PRFM and PRP as autologous platelet preparation accelerate wound healing in FTSG, with PRFM being superior due to the higher number of PMN, macrophage, and fibroblast.
KW - FTSG
KW - PRFM
KW - PRP
KW - Wound healing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105502675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102350
DO - 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102350
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105502675
SN - 2049-0801
VL - 66
JO - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
JF - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
M1 - 102350
ER -