TY - JOUR
T1 - Community engagement and waste management policy
T2 - 1st International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, JESSD 2020
AU - Brotosusilo, Agus
AU - Hilya Nabila, Siti
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Higher Education Leading Basic Research Program (PDUPT) 2020 of the Ministry of Research and Technolog/National Research and Innovation Agency (Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi (PDUPT) Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi/Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional/KEMENRISTEK/BRIN-Universitas Indonesia with contract numbers 8/E1/KP.PTNBH/2020 and 255/PKS/R/UI/2020
Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/25
Y1 - 2020/11/25
N2 - Municipal waste management has become a significant problem in many urban areas where solutions are complex and conflicting to form. One of the most important actors that can control waste management in a country is the government. Then the most important tool for setting standards in maintaining waste management is the public policy. Therefore, this paper will review and evaluate public policies that regulate solid waste management in China, Japan, and Malaysia, using secondary data. The three countries were chosen because their cases represented various significant and different factors that have often been an obstacle to waste management. The three case studies discuss community behavior analysis, policy mistranslation, and the lack of waste management infrastructure. The main obstacles of the waste management policy are to control people's behavior, lack of garbage infrastructure, waste pickers are not organized, and lack of progress in waste management and recycling technology. The waste management policy needs to focus on increasing residents' awareness to recycle and expand the producer's responsibility to increase community engagement and boost successful waste management in a region or country.
AB - Municipal waste management has become a significant problem in many urban areas where solutions are complex and conflicting to form. One of the most important actors that can control waste management in a country is the government. Then the most important tool for setting standards in maintaining waste management is the public policy. Therefore, this paper will review and evaluate public policies that regulate solid waste management in China, Japan, and Malaysia, using secondary data. The three countries were chosen because their cases represented various significant and different factors that have often been an obstacle to waste management. The three case studies discuss community behavior analysis, policy mistranslation, and the lack of waste management infrastructure. The main obstacles of the waste management policy are to control people's behavior, lack of garbage infrastructure, waste pickers are not organized, and lack of progress in waste management and recycling technology. The waste management policy needs to focus on increasing residents' awareness to recycle and expand the producer's responsibility to increase community engagement and boost successful waste management in a region or country.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097641634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/e3sconf/202021103022
DO - 10.1051/e3sconf/202021103022
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85097641634
SN - 2555-0403
VL - 211
JO - E3S Web of Conferences
JF - E3S Web of Conferences
M1 - 03022
Y2 - 28 September 2020 through 30 September 2020
ER -