TY - JOUR
T1 - Case report
T2 - Unpredictable nature of tubal cancer
AU - Purbadi, Sigit
AU - Andika Santawi, Victor Prana
AU - Tjahjadi, Hartono
AU - Matondang, Sahat
AU - Nuranna, Laila
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Introduction: Primary tubal cancer is very rare, most are diagnosed intra and post operatively. Histopathology is vital in determining the cancer origin. Here we present a case of fallopian tube cancer with clinical presentation mimicking endometrial origin. Case description: A 74-year old patient came with complaints of intermittent post-menopausal bleeding and pelvic pain. The patient had several investigations using Ultrasonography, Hysteroscopy-guided biopsy, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pre-operative diagnosis was endometrial cancer based on histopathology of endometrial biopsy during hysteroscopy. Explorative laparotomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection were then performed, and the tumor samples were sent to the histopathology laboratory. It was found that the post-operative diagnosis was in fact primary fallopian tube cancer stage IIB. Conclusion: For patients with gynecological malignancies, rare cases such as fallopian tube cancer should never be overlooked as a differential diagnosis.
AB - Introduction: Primary tubal cancer is very rare, most are diagnosed intra and post operatively. Histopathology is vital in determining the cancer origin. Here we present a case of fallopian tube cancer with clinical presentation mimicking endometrial origin. Case description: A 74-year old patient came with complaints of intermittent post-menopausal bleeding and pelvic pain. The patient had several investigations using Ultrasonography, Hysteroscopy-guided biopsy, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pre-operative diagnosis was endometrial cancer based on histopathology of endometrial biopsy during hysteroscopy. Explorative laparotomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection were then performed, and the tumor samples were sent to the histopathology laboratory. It was found that the post-operative diagnosis was in fact primary fallopian tube cancer stage IIB. Conclusion: For patients with gynecological malignancies, rare cases such as fallopian tube cancer should never be overlooked as a differential diagnosis.
KW - Case report
KW - Diagnostic
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Fallopian tube cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079152479&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.01.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079152479
SN - 2049-0801
VL - 51
SP - 44
EP - 47
JO - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
JF - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
ER -