TY - JOUR
T1 - Can Cryoprotectant’s modification in Spermatozoa Cryopreservation be an Alternative to Improve Embryo Quality? A Review
AU - Larasati, Manggiasih Dwiayu
AU - Lestari, Silvia Werdhy
AU - Hestiantoro, Andon
AU - Pangestu, Mulyoto
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the "Center for Education Financial Services" and "Indonesian Endowment Funds for Education" for supporting the writer on this study
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, International Journal of Technology.All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Spermatozoa cryopreservation is an effective method for maintaining male fertility in humans. Nevertheless, there are some limitations of sperm cryopreservation, which is called as cell injury by cryoprotectant, that cannot be avoided. This process will affect embryo quality. Therefore, it is mandatory to modify cryoprotectant in spermatozoa cryopreservation, to improve embryo quality. This review aimed to summarize the modification of cryoprotectant that can damage the cell, thereby improving embryo quality. To this purpose, a computerized search of EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases from 2008 to 2022 were performed on general term such as “sperm cryopreservation”, “cryoprotective agent”, “modified cryoprotectant”, “cell injury”. Of these, 1847 publications were screened and 38 articles were obtained and evaluated. Although no formal conclusions can be drawn regarding the cryopreservation of spermatozoa to obtain good embryo quality, our results suggest that modified cryoprotectants can be an alternative cryoprotectant compared to commercial cryoprotectants. In addition, the use of antioxidant in spermatozoa cryopreservation can also prevent cell damage due to the negative effects of cryoprotectants.
AB - Spermatozoa cryopreservation is an effective method for maintaining male fertility in humans. Nevertheless, there are some limitations of sperm cryopreservation, which is called as cell injury by cryoprotectant, that cannot be avoided. This process will affect embryo quality. Therefore, it is mandatory to modify cryoprotectant in spermatozoa cryopreservation, to improve embryo quality. This review aimed to summarize the modification of cryoprotectant that can damage the cell, thereby improving embryo quality. To this purpose, a computerized search of EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases from 2008 to 2022 were performed on general term such as “sperm cryopreservation”, “cryoprotective agent”, “modified cryoprotectant”, “cell injury”. Of these, 1847 publications were screened and 38 articles were obtained and evaluated. Although no formal conclusions can be drawn regarding the cryopreservation of spermatozoa to obtain good embryo quality, our results suggest that modified cryoprotectants can be an alternative cryoprotectant compared to commercial cryoprotectants. In addition, the use of antioxidant in spermatozoa cryopreservation can also prevent cell damage due to the negative effects of cryoprotectants.
KW - Cell injury
KW - Cryoprotectant agent
KW - Modified cryoprotectant
KW - Sperm cryopreservation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146340198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14716/ijtech.v13i8.6129
DO - 10.14716/ijtech.v13i8.6129
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146340198
SN - 2086-9614
VL - 13
SP - 1755
EP - 1767
JO - International Journal of Technology
JF - International Journal of Technology
IS - 8
ER -