TY - JOUR
T1 - Behind the Jokowi’s victory
T2 - did economic voting matter in the 2014 Indonesian presidential election?
AU - Aji, Nurdien
AU - Dartanto, Teguh
N1 - Funding Information:
We declared that there is no a conflict of interest in writing this article. This article is written based on our personal interest and we received partially financial support from Hibah PITTA Universitas Indonesia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Japan Section of the Regional Science Association International.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - The 2014 presidential election marked Indonesia’s transition into a mature democratic Islamic country. Joko Widodo, known as Jokowi, was inaugurated as Indonesia’s seventh president, defeated Prabowo Subianto by a margin of 53.1–46.9%, respectively. In the absence of an incumbent, voters evaluated both presidential candidates based on a mix of prospective and retrospective economic performance. This study merges data from the Village Potential Census (PODES) and the crowdsource data (Kawal Pemilu) from vote recap to investigate the existence of economic voting and the effect of socioeconomic conditions at the village level on voting behavior. Our study confirmed that economic access, conditions of infrastructure, and middle-class group played major roles in the Jokowi victory. The middle class tended to choose Jokowi, because his ideology best matched their own. Moreover, social cleavages related to religion and ethnicity are still dominant as villages with a Muslim majority tended to choose Prabowo that was associated with an Islamic representative. Unfortunately, media and black campaigns also significantly influenced voters’ decisions. This evidence provides valuable lessons learned for Indonesians in preparing for a better 2019 presidential election.
AB - The 2014 presidential election marked Indonesia’s transition into a mature democratic Islamic country. Joko Widodo, known as Jokowi, was inaugurated as Indonesia’s seventh president, defeated Prabowo Subianto by a margin of 53.1–46.9%, respectively. In the absence of an incumbent, voters evaluated both presidential candidates based on a mix of prospective and retrospective economic performance. This study merges data from the Village Potential Census (PODES) and the crowdsource data (Kawal Pemilu) from vote recap to investigate the existence of economic voting and the effect of socioeconomic conditions at the village level on voting behavior. Our study confirmed that economic access, conditions of infrastructure, and middle-class group played major roles in the Jokowi victory. The middle class tended to choose Jokowi, because his ideology best matched their own. Moreover, social cleavages related to religion and ethnicity are still dominant as villages with a Muslim majority tended to choose Prabowo that was associated with an Islamic representative. Unfortunately, media and black campaigns also significantly influenced voters’ decisions. This evidence provides valuable lessons learned for Indonesians in preparing for a better 2019 presidential election.
KW - Economic voting
KW - Indonesia
KW - Local economy
KW - Middle class
KW - Presidential election
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100631061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s41685-018-0083-3
DO - 10.1007/s41685-018-0083-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100631061
SN - 2509-7954
VL - 2
SP - 115
EP - 138
JO - Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
JF - Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
IS - 1
ER -