TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of turbulence model for cross-flow pico hydro turbine numerical simulation
AU - Siswantara, Ahmad Indra
AU - Budiarso, null
AU - Prakoso, Aji Putro
AU - Gunadi, Gun Gun R.
AU - Warjito, null
AU - Adanta, Dendy
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to express they’re thanks to KEMENRISTEK DIKTI, which has funded this research with grant No. SP. DIPA-042.06.1.401516/2018.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Penerbit Akademia Baru. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This study will be assessing some turbulence model for numerical simulation in Pico hydro cross-flow turbine with three variables like errors, time per iteration and average iterations to converged. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods in this study using ANSYS™ FLUENT® 18.2 academic licensed with two-dimensional (2D) and feature six-degrees of freedom (6-DoF). Then, validation and verification were done by comparing with previous study. There are six turbulence model that compared: standard wall function k-ε, scalable wall function k-ε, standard wall function RNG, scalable wall function RNG, standard transitional SST, and transitional SST with curvature corrections. From the results, all the turbulent models give the almost similar results. However, if by error assessment, the RNG turbulence model with scalable wall function was the most accurate than others. By number of timestep iterations assessment, the transitional SST with curvature correction resulting more quickly to convergence than others. By timestep calculations times, the standard transitional SST has relative average calculation timestep smaller than others. Thus, based on assessment the turbulence model suitable for numerical simulation in pico hydro cross-flow turbine is standard transitional SST.
AB - This study will be assessing some turbulence model for numerical simulation in Pico hydro cross-flow turbine with three variables like errors, time per iteration and average iterations to converged. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods in this study using ANSYS™ FLUENT® 18.2 academic licensed with two-dimensional (2D) and feature six-degrees of freedom (6-DoF). Then, validation and verification were done by comparing with previous study. There are six turbulence model that compared: standard wall function k-ε, scalable wall function k-ε, standard wall function RNG, scalable wall function RNG, standard transitional SST, and transitional SST with curvature corrections. From the results, all the turbulent models give the almost similar results. However, if by error assessment, the RNG turbulence model with scalable wall function was the most accurate than others. By number of timestep iterations assessment, the transitional SST with curvature correction resulting more quickly to convergence than others. By timestep calculations times, the standard transitional SST has relative average calculation timestep smaller than others. Thus, based on assessment the turbulence model suitable for numerical simulation in pico hydro cross-flow turbine is standard transitional SST.
KW - 6-DoF
KW - CFD
KW - Cross-flow turbine
KW - Pico hydro
KW - Turbulence model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059855451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059855451
SN - 2180-1363
VL - 10
SP - 38
EP - 48
JO - CFD Letters
JF - CFD Letters
IS - 2
ER -