TY - JOUR
T1 - Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis
T2 - a 2016 update
AU - Shiha, Gamal
AU - Ibrahim, Alaa
AU - Helmy, Ahmed
AU - Sarin, Shiv Kumar
AU - Omata, Masao
AU - Kumar, Ashish
AU - Bernstien, David
AU - Maruyama, Hitushi
AU - Saraswat, Vivek
AU - Chawla, Yogesh
AU - Hamid, Saeed
AU - Abbas, Zaigham
AU - Bedossa, Pierre
AU - Sakhuja, Puja
AU - Elmahatab, Mamun
AU - Lim, Seng Gee
AU - Lesmana, Laurentius M. Adrianto
AU - Sollano, Jose
AU - Jia, Ji Dong
AU - Abbas, Bahaa
AU - Omar, Ashraf
AU - Sharma, Barjesh
AU - Payawal, Diana
AU - Abdallah, Ahmed
AU - Serwah, Abdelhamid
AU - Hamed, Abdelkhalek
AU - Elsayed, Aly
AU - AbdelMaqsod, Amany
AU - Hassanein, Tarek
AU - Ihab, Ahmed
AU - GHaziuan, Hamsik
AU - Zein, Nizar
AU - Kumar, Manoj
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Hepatic fibrosis is a common pathway leading to liver cirrhosis, which is the end result of any injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Despite the fact that liver biopsy (LB) has been considered the "gold standard" of assessment of hepatic fibrosis, LB is not favored by patients or physicians owing to its invasiveness, limitations, sampling errors, etc. Therefore, many alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis are gaining more popularity and have assumed great importance, and many data on such approaches are being generated. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The first consensus guidelines of the APASL recommendations on hepatic fibrosis were published in 2009. Due to advances in the field, we present herein the APASL 2016 updated version on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved review of all available published literature by a core group of experts who subsequently proposed consensus statements followed by discussion of the contentious issues and unanimous approval of the consensus statements. The Oxford System of the evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from one (highest) to five (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The topics covered in the guidelines include invasive methods (LB and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements), blood tests, conventional radiological methods, elastography techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatic fibrosis assessment methods, in addition to fibrosis assessment in special and rare situations.
AB - Hepatic fibrosis is a common pathway leading to liver cirrhosis, which is the end result of any injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Despite the fact that liver biopsy (LB) has been considered the "gold standard" of assessment of hepatic fibrosis, LB is not favored by patients or physicians owing to its invasiveness, limitations, sampling errors, etc. Therefore, many alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis are gaining more popularity and have assumed great importance, and many data on such approaches are being generated. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The first consensus guidelines of the APASL recommendations on hepatic fibrosis were published in 2009. Due to advances in the field, we present herein the APASL 2016 updated version on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved review of all available published literature by a core group of experts who subsequently proposed consensus statements followed by discussion of the contentious issues and unanimous approval of the consensus statements. The Oxford System of the evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from one (highest) to five (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The topics covered in the guidelines include invasive methods (LB and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements), blood tests, conventional radiological methods, elastography techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatic fibrosis assessment methods, in addition to fibrosis assessment in special and rare situations.
KW - Chronic liver disease
KW - Cirrhosis
KW - Graft fibrosis
KW - Hepatitis B
KW - Hepatitis C
KW - Invasive assessment, non-invasive assessment
KW - Liver fibrosis
KW - Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990858680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12072-016-9760-3
DO - 10.1007/s12072-016-9760-3
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 27714681
AN - SCOPUS:84990858680
SN - 1936-0533
VL - 11
JO - Hepatology International
JF - Hepatology International
IS - 1
ER -