Analysis of Infection Prevention Control Nurse performance: A descriptive study

Amelia Asmara; Rr Tutik Sri Hariyati; Hanny Handiyani; Imelda Avia

doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.006

Analysis of Infection Prevention Control Nurse performance: A descriptive study

Amelia Asmara, Rr Tutik Sri Hariyati, Hanny Handiyani, Imelda Avia

Basic Science and Fundamental of Nursing Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the performance and influencing factors of Infection Prevention Control Nurses (IPCN). Method: This research used a descriptive cross-sectional design. A total of 32 IPCN working in several hospitals in Indonesia were recruited. All nurses are members of the Nurses Association of Infection Prevention Control. The participants completed an online questionnaire, which was created by using Google Form and the link was distributed through a WhatsApp Group. Results: The performance criteria score of IPCN was 50% poor and 50% well. Moreover, the reward is the most factors related to IPCN performance. Odds Ratio (OR) of the reward variable was 27.5, which means that a good reward had 28 a good chance to improve the performance compared to IPCN which received fewer rewards after controlling of other variables. Conclusions: The performance of IPCN must be further improved to encourage the better quality of services, especially in controlling infection.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	36-40
Number of pages	5
Journal	Enfermeria Clinica
Volume	29
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.006
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

Infection prevention nurse control
Nurse performance
Service quality

Access to Document

10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.006

Cite this

@article{be5b1f6ef28e4f47b0f8a0893fe11c92,

title = "Analysis of Infection Prevention Control Nurse performance: A descriptive study",

abstract = "Objective: To analyze the performance and influencing factors of Infection Prevention Control Nurses (IPCN). Method: This research used a descriptive cross-sectional design. A total of 32 IPCN working in several hospitals in Indonesia were recruited. All nurses are members of the Nurses Association of Infection Prevention Control. The participants completed an online questionnaire, which was created by using Google Form and the link was distributed through a WhatsApp Group. Results: The performance criteria score of IPCN was 50% poor and 50% well. Moreover, the reward is the most factors related to IPCN performance. Odds Ratio (OR) of the reward variable was 27.5, which means that a good reward had 28 a good chance to improve the performance compared to IPCN which received fewer rewards after controlling of other variables. Conclusions: The performance of IPCN must be further improved to encourage the better quality of services, especially in controlling infection.",

keywords = "Infection prevention nurse control, Nurse performance, Service quality",

author = "Amelia Asmara and Hariyati, {Rr Tutik Sri} and Hanny Handiyani and Imelda Avia",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Espa{\~n}a, S.L.U.",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.006",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "36--40",

journal = "Enfermeria Clinica",

issn = "1130-8621",

publisher = "Ediciones Doyma, S.L.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of Infection Prevention Control Nurse performance

T2 - A descriptive study

AU - Asmara, Amelia

AU - Hariyati, Rr Tutik Sri

AU - Handiyani, Hanny

AU - Avia, Imelda

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To analyze the performance and influencing factors of Infection Prevention Control Nurses (IPCN). Method: This research used a descriptive cross-sectional design. A total of 32 IPCN working in several hospitals in Indonesia were recruited. All nurses are members of the Nurses Association of Infection Prevention Control. The participants completed an online questionnaire, which was created by using Google Form and the link was distributed through a WhatsApp Group. Results: The performance criteria score of IPCN was 50% poor and 50% well. Moreover, the reward is the most factors related to IPCN performance. Odds Ratio (OR) of the reward variable was 27.5, which means that a good reward had 28 a good chance to improve the performance compared to IPCN which received fewer rewards after controlling of other variables. Conclusions: The performance of IPCN must be further improved to encourage the better quality of services, especially in controlling infection.

AB - Objective: To analyze the performance and influencing factors of Infection Prevention Control Nurses (IPCN). Method: This research used a descriptive cross-sectional design. A total of 32 IPCN working in several hospitals in Indonesia were recruited. All nurses are members of the Nurses Association of Infection Prevention Control. The participants completed an online questionnaire, which was created by using Google Form and the link was distributed through a WhatsApp Group. Results: The performance criteria score of IPCN was 50% poor and 50% well. Moreover, the reward is the most factors related to IPCN performance. Odds Ratio (OR) of the reward variable was 27.5, which means that a good reward had 28 a good chance to improve the performance compared to IPCN which received fewer rewards after controlling of other variables. Conclusions: The performance of IPCN must be further improved to encourage the better quality of services, especially in controlling infection.

KW - Infection prevention nurse control

KW - Nurse performance

KW - Service quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067000702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067000702

SN - 1130-8621

VL - 29

SP - 36

EP - 40

JO - Enfermeria Clinica

JF - Enfermeria Clinica

ER -

Analysis of Infection Prevention Control Nurse performance: A descriptive study

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this